Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992)
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
FIRST AMENDMENT FRACTURED BY RICHARD CARAVIELLO
§ 1-2-5 OATH OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. The Mayor and Council members, before entering upon the duties of their respective offices, shall take the following oath: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I am duly qualified, according to the constitution of this state, to exercise the duties of the office to which I have been elected and that I will, to the best of my ability, discharge the duties thereof, and preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of this state and of the United States. As Mayor (or Council member) of the City of Dillon, I will equally, fairly, and impartially, to the best of my ability, and skill, exercise the trust reposed in me, and will use my best endeavor to preserve the peace and carry into effect according to law, the purposes for which I have been elected, So help me God.”Editorial Note: For statutory provisions concerning the structure, organization, duties, powers and functions of the Council, see S.C. Code §§ 5-13-10 et seq.State Law Reference: Constitutional oath of office, S.C. Const., Art. VI, Sec. 5 Statutory oath, S.C. Code § 5-15-150https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/dillon/latest/dillon_sc/0-0-0-76
REPROBATE CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAS GONE WAY DOWNHILL AFTER DEFACING PROPERTY IN MEDFORD TO CAMPAIGN FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
RICHARD F. CARAVIELLO LIED TO THE MEDFORD POLICE IN AN ATTEMPT TO STOP A JOURNALIST FROM INFORMING THE VOTERS, TAXPAYERS, CITIZENS, BUSINESSES, CIVIC GROUPS AND VISITORS TO MEDFORD of Caraviello’s wrongful conduct.
ALLEGEDLY HE LIED UNDER OATH IN CRIMINAL COURT AS WELL, JANUARY 31, 2017, THE SAME WEEK THAT EX POLICE CHIEF LEO A. SACCO JR’S SON JOSEPH SACCO WAS PULLED OVER FOR ALLEGED DRUNK DRIVING.
THIS ESSAY IS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION, ROBERT’S RULES OF ORDER, THE OPEN MEETING LAW AND HOW MUCH SELF RESPECT MEDFORD CITIZENS HAVE FOR THEMSELVES ALLOWING THIS MALFEASANCE TO FESTER.
On May 11, 2021 it is alleged that Caraviello and rookie councilor, unkempt Isaac Bears, were out of bounds and out of order when there was mayhem (again) while a former city councilor attempted to express himself. In Medford they squelch free speech and freedom of the press, intentionally, fracturing the oath of office they take along with the 30k annually each. Ouch!
The General authored the first version, a booklet, in 1876 to help
provide order and fair play in meetings of deliberative assembles. He
with several descendants and colleagues updated, expanded, and
republished the book over the decades to become the primary
parliamentary authority used for groups and boards of all kinds to
govern their meetings. In the 1990’s, the RRA invited several
parliamentary experts to join with Henry Martyn Robert III on the
The Authorship Team manages the content for the books and provides
guidance to the parliamentary community through the “Robert’s Rules
Forum”. Should you have questions of a parliamentary nature, you should
go to the Robert’s Rules Forum online to get further clarification.